Pro-Life Update

Return to Pro-Life Updates


March 2006

The Pro-Life movement has lately seen great strides towards the Culture of Life. President Bush has had the opportunity to promote Pro-Life legislation on the national level; Texas has passed solid Pro-Life legislation, and the U.S. Supreme Court has welcomed two strict constructionist justices. More Americans are recognizing the destructive nature of abortion and rejecting it as an option. However, an upcoming threat still exists with assisted suicide. This issue has not received the same recognition as abortion or biotechnology, but this battle is just as intense. Several states have tried to legalize euthanasia, but only Oregon has thus far. They stand as a reminder that we have much work to do and we must remain ever-vigilant. Life must be protected at all stages.


Please read this issue of the Pro-Life Update carefully to understand some of the challenges we now face and how you—an educated Pro-Lifer—can advance the Culture of Life. Please share this information with your family, friends, and church congregations. Make copies. Spread the news.


President Bush Reiterates Support for Life

In President George W. Bush’s sixth State of the Union address, he reiterated his deep respect for human life: “Human life is a gift from our Creator—and that gift should never be discarded, devalued, or put up for sale.” He called for a need to promote scientific research that is ethically responsible and explained that science and medicine should not “cut ethical corners.”

During his address at the March for Life in January, he spoke of the advances made by his administration towards a Culture of Life. During his presidency, he has banned the use of taxpayer money on programs that promote abortion overseas, signed a partial-birth abortion ban (which is still being defended in the courts), and enacted the Unborn Victims of Violence Act (Laci and Connor’s Bill). They are “vigorously promoting parental notification laws, adoption, teen abstinence, crisis pregnancy programs, and the vital work of our faith-based groups.” He has also signed a bill that promotes ethical stem cell research from umbilical cord blood. He continues to urge Congress to ban “the most egregious abuse of medical research: human cloning, creating or implanting embryos for experiments, creating human-animal hybrids, and buying, selling, or patenting human embryos.”

We are blessed that President Bush has taken a clear stance in support of Life. He understands that we can change our culture by changing the laws. He is a compassionate man who recognizes the need to approach the abortion debate delicately. In his State of the Union address, he said that his message to women facing unplanned pregnancies is: “We love you, we love your child, and we’re here to help you.”

Samuel Alito, Jr. Confirmed to U.S. Supreme Court
On January 31, 2006, Justice Samuel Alito, Jr., was sworn in to the U.S. Supreme Court. The second high court appointment by President George W. Bush, Justice Alito promises to be a strict constructionist. Bush said in a statement: "Sam Alito is a brilliant and fair-minded judge who strictly interprets the Constitution and laws and does not legislate from the bench… He is a man of deep character and integrity, and he will make all Americans proud as a justice on our highest court."

Federally Controlled Narcotics OK for Assisted Suicide
On January 17, 2006, in a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federally controlled narcotics and other dangerous drugs can be used to kill patients. The Bush Administration and former Attorney General John Ashcroft questioned whether these federally controlled drugs should be used to end a life, as they are in Oregon where assisted suicide is legal.

Current relevant statutes claim that a doctor may prescribe these drugs only for a “legitimate medical purpose.” Justice Antonin Scalia, in the dissent, stated that, “If the term ‘legitimate’ medical purpose has any meaning, it surely excludes the use of prescription drugs to produce death.”

In the majority decision, the justices clarified that the federal drug control law was designed to prevent drug abuse that leads to “addiction or abnormal effects on the nervous system.” Justice Clarence Thomas opined that “The majority does not expressly address whether the ingestion of a quantity of drugs that is sufficient to cause death has an ‘abnormal effec[t] on the nervous system,’ though it implicitly rejects such a conclusion.”

Texas Receives “F” from NARAL Pro-Choice America
According to NARAL Pro-Choice America’s newest report, Texas has received an “F” rating. This, of course, means that the Pro-Life movement is thriving in Texas. As their website states, Governor Rick Perry, Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst, and Attorney General Greg Abbot all oppose abortion. The Texas House and Senate are both Pro-Life, and we have seven laws that NARAL identifies as “anti-choice,” including A Woman’s Right to Know, Physician-Only Restriction, Parental Consent, and a conscience clause for medical providers who do not want to be involved with abortion.

Additionally, 93 percent of Texas counties do not have an abortion provider. The Pro-Life movement is glad to see these advances in the state. As more Texans recognize the destructive nature of abortion—for women, men, and their babies—they are ardently turning away from the culture of death.

The Pro-Life movement still has much work to ensure that all people throughout the world are welcomed into Life and respected. If you would like any additional information on the topics discussed above, please send me a note or log onto www.TexasRightToLife.com. If you ever have questions about any Pro-Life issues, please be sure to let me know.


Yours for Life,

Dr. Joseph M. Graham
President