|
|
Will to Live Two common advance directives are Living Wills and Durable Powers of Attorney. Living Wills focus on the rejection of life saving medical treatment under certain medical conditions. Durable Powers of Attorney authorize a specified person to make decisions concerning the provision or withholding of life-sustaining measures when the signer is incompetent. Though such laws appear to protect patients' rights, they have some serious flaws and are not Pro-Life in their intent. Problems with a Living Will Many people who do not want medical technology to prolong their last days will sign a Living Will; however, the terminology used in a Living Will is not specific enough. Webster’s Dictionary defines “terminal” as “of or in the final stages of a fatal disease.” However, doctors and hospitals may arbitrarily decide that a patient is terminal when he simply needs rehabilitative care and medicine; sadly, an individual is often deemed terminal simply because he would live with some type of permanent disability, despite the fact that his life could be saved by medical treatment. For example, one widely used Living Will declaration states, “If I should be in an incurable or irreversible mental or physical condition with no reasonable expectation of recovery, I direct my attending physician to withhold or withdraw treatment that merely prolongs my dying.” There are several problems with this declaration. First, this is an extremely broad statement and, technically, if a patient has a permanent limp or even impaired vision or hearing, or merely loses a finger, he could have an irreversible physical condition. Furthermore, the statement offers no time frame for recovery. Finally, from a legal standpoint, every life-saving medical treatment prolongs dying, including an antibiotic for a sinus infection. The classification of persistent vegetative state (PVS) is often used to justify withdrawal of nutrition and hydration or other life-saving medical treatments. The family and friends of patients should seriously question this diagnosis. Patients (such as Terri Schiavo) are routinely labeled as PVS due to some incapacity or disability, but an accurate PVS diagnosis is difficult to make since many patients have only some impaired faculties, while other mental and bodily functions are fully operational. Also important to note is the fact that countless patients have emerged from so-called PVS after years and even decades. A Better Choice National Right to Life has developed an alternative, life-affirming advance directive called the "Will to Live." This document presumes that food, fluids, and life-saving medical treatment are to be provided. However, a signer can also specify conditions under which this presumption does not fully apply, such as when death is imminent or when the signer is in the final stages of terminal illness. Suggestions are given for ways to list one's end-of-life directives with precision and detail. A Will to Live
If you do not want medical technology to prolong your last hours but also do not want to be starved, dehydrated, or allowed to die simply because you have a disability, the medical community will be far more likely to respect your wishes if you sign a properly prepared Will to Live than if you sign a Living Will. As with any legal document, you should consult a Pro-Life lawyer who specializes in health care to ensure that you completely understand the legal implications of your requests. Download the Texas Will to Live Now! * * To view files marked with an asterisk, you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader.
|