Healthcare program for women can take effect with Pro-Life rule!
While most legislators in the 83rd Legislative Session returned to their home districts to enjoy a long weekend, Texas Right to Life stayed at the Capitol for the latest court battle in which Planned Parenthood (PP) was hoping to score a victory for "abortion rights" today. However, in a surprising move, the judge, who was hand-picked by the abortion giant, denied PP’s request for a Temporary Injunction, green-lighting the Women’s Health Program to take effect without abortion providers in the program.
Judge Stephen Yelenosky heard seven hours of legal arguments and testimony about the Women’s Health Program and the impact of excluding PP, America’s largest abortion provider, from the program. PP argued that women would have nowhere to turn for basic screenings and exams if the abortion giant were kicked out of the program.
The Women’s Health Program began in 2005 as a demonstration project to serve low-income women who do not qualify for regular Medicaid. In 2005, Texas Right to Life successfully added restrictions to the authorizing legislation, but these restrictions were never enforced. In 2011, when the program was renewed, legislators adopted Texas Right to Life’s language to clarify that abortion providers and their affiliates [including Planned Parenthood] were barred from participating in this taxpayer funded healthcare program. Since then, PP has filed two lawsuits to stop the newer, stronger Pro-Life rule from being implemented in order to remain eligible for taxpayer funding.
Planned Parenthood confirmed again in court on Friday that it wants no Women’s Health Program if excluded from the program. This—from the organization that allegedly champions women’s health? Planned Parenthood is robbing the pockets of Texas taxpayers while denying women access to health care at other providers and agencies that offer a full spectrum of services—except abortion. The Attorney General’s representatives aptly presented the HHSC findings on at least 1,500 new, clean, eligible providers who are not affiliated with abortion, sending air right through the hollow claim that Texas women cannot survive without Planned Parenthood.
What was not discussed in court is that if PP were granted access, then by design, the whole program would dissolve. The abortion provider claimed to be fighting for Texas women, but PP is really only fighting for public funds, while trampling women’s health. Ironically, while arguing about having to close clinics due to potential loss of WHP reimbursement dollars, Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s annual report was released this week, announcing $542 million in government grants, which of course, is from American taxpayers. (The report also certified that the number of abortions committed in the last fiscal year increased to 333,964.)
The Texas Attorney General’s office attested to the Legislature’s authority to establish parameters for taxpayer-funded programs and that expanding the WHP without abortion providers is an appropriate legislative action. Three witnesses appeared for the plaintiffs; one presented herself as an indigent, minority patient who has suffered from the new rule. Her answers to additional questions under oath revealed that she had achieved a college degree, had served for years as an advocate for Vox, Planned Parenthood’s campus activity group, and then as a paid, community educator on birth control and STD’s for the organization.
Judge Stephen Yelenosky of the 345th District Court in Travis County, a Democrat, denied the Temporary Injunction within an hour after the hearing ended. The Women’s Health Program can now be implemented with the Pro-Life rule, crafted by Texas Right to Life in 2011, that excludes abortion providers from the program. This is a victory for women’s health in Texas!
- Opposition grows against SB303
The number of groups and citizens opposed to Senate Bill 303 continues to gain ground.
- National Right to Life urges Texans to oppose Senate Bill 303
- Despite proponents' claims, SB 303 allows denial of food and water
Take action to protect Texas patients.
- Terri Schiavo's brother urges Texas House members to reject SB 303
Bobby Schindler asks House members to spare Texans the pain encountered by his sister and to vote no on SB 303.
- Death Panel Bill Hearing Monday in Texas House
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons implores Texans to contact their representatives about SB 303.
- Big Medicine vs. Patient's Rights
- Attorney General Greg Abbott accepts Defender of Life Award
Texas Attorney General accepts the "Defender of Life Award" at the Montgomery County Right to Life 2013 Dinner For Life.
- Hostile Orders
Should the decision be the patient's or the doctor's?
- The Void of Reason
If you missed it, the President gave a twelve minute speech at Planned Parenthood's annual gala.
- Texas 14-year-old given abortion pills against will by abuser
A Texas man is accused of impregnating a minor and coercing her into taking abortion pills.
- WND comments on proposed reforms to Texas' futile care law
New bill in works would end life despite patient, family wishes
- Texas rallies for higher abortion clinic standards, vows to prevent Gosnell horrors
Commonsense legislation would hold abortion clinics to the same standards and regulations to which other medical facilities are held.
- SB303: Long on process; short on patient protections
State Senate sends flawed and dangerous Advance Directive Bill to House
- Texas Right to Life outlines concerns with SB303 and CSSB303
Here is a chart comparing the proposed reforms of the Texas Advanced Directive Law, to real, effective reform.
- State and national Pro-Life leaders oppose Senate Bill 303, House Bill 1444
In a letter to Texas State Legislators, Pro-Life leaders and medical professionals stated their concerns with proposed "reforms" to the Texas futile care law.
- Dr. Elizabeth Wickham, President of LifeTree, Comments on Texas SB 303
- Texas Preborn Pain: Pro-Life side prevails in hearing
Multiple Pro-Life medical and legal experts demonstrated the need for and defended the bill against one of the most pro-abortion members of the Texas House of Representatives.
- Texas is about to face another crisis in its healthcare
Everyone in the State, regardless of their present state of health could be affected by this Bill in the event of a serious illness or an accident.
- Experts set to testify on Texas Right to Life's PreBorn Pain Bill
Medical professionals will testify before the House State Affairs Committee offering support of the Texas Preborn Pain Bill.
- Truce keeps Texas budget Pro-Life and House floor calm
//Share this message
Help reveal pro-abortion candidates who are hiding their anti-Life record from voters by immediately donating $50, $100, $250, $500, $1,000 or even $2,500.
Texas Right to Life Welcomes a New Class of 'Generation Now' Scholars