Abortion providers across Texas filed a class-action lawsuit last summer to keep the new Texas Sonogram Law from taking effect. Abortion advocates claimed that the law violated their First Amendment rights by forcing them to disclose certain information -- information about the unborn children they are about to kill -- to their abortion patients. The lawsuit was filed in pro-choice Judge Sam Sparks’ court, and Sparks ruled that the law would not go into effect while he examined the constitutionality of the law.
This morning, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld the Sonogram Law, and lifted Sparks’ injunction. The opposition desperately fought to keep the window to the womb closed since 70 to 80% of women will choose life after seeing the child on the screen.
Texas Right to Life Legislative Director John Seago commented on the ruling:
This ruling marks the turning point in this long court battle over the strongest and most effective sonogram law in the nation, empowering pregnant women with, accurate informed consent information before finalizing any decision about their pregnancy. This law will protect pregnant women from the routine deception practiced at abortion clinics, and women deserve the truth about the life in their womb.
Texas Right to Life’s directors attended the hearing at the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans last week when the three-judge panel artfully challenged opposing counsel about their push for reversal of the law. The panel ruled against the Center for Reproductive Rights, confirming that they “failed to demonstrate constitutional flaws in H.B. 15.” Furthermore, the panel said that the preliminary injunction set by Judge Sparks was based on two erroneous arguments: (1) vagueness and (2) unconstitutionality, and the judges recognized that the sonogram law is indeed an appropriate way to strengthen informed consent before an abortion:
To belabor the obvious and conceded point, the required disclosures of a sonogram, the fetal heartbeat, and their medical descriptions are the epitome of truthful, non-misleading information. They are not different in kind, although more graphic and scientifically up-to-date, than the disclosures discussed in Casey -- probable gestational age of the fetus and printed material showing a baby’s general prenatal development stages.
Extra bonus: Court costs were assessed to the plaintiffs!!!
Click here to read the panel's opinion.
Or click here to listen to the court hearing audio.
- Anatomy of a Spin: Unraveling the SB 303 Saga as 'reported' by Texas Tribune
- Opposition grows against SB303
The number of groups and citizens opposed to Senate Bill 303 continues to gain ground.
- National Right to Life urges Texans to oppose Senate Bill 303
- Despite proponents' claims, SB 303 allows denial of food and water
Take action to protect Texas patients.
- Terri Schiavo's brother urges Texas House members to reject SB 303
Bobby Schindler asks House members to spare Texans the pain encountered by his sister and to vote no on SB 303.
- Death Panel Bill Hearing Monday in Texas House
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons implores Texans to contact their representatives about SB 303.
- Big Medicine vs. Patient's Rights
- Attorney General Greg Abbott accepts Defender of Life Award
Texas Attorney General accepts the "Defender of Life Award" at the Montgomery County Right to Life 2013 Dinner For Life.
- Hostile Orders
Should the decision be the patient's or the doctor's?
- The Void of Reason
If you missed it, the President gave a twelve minute speech at Planned Parenthood's annual gala.
- Texas 14-year-old given abortion pills against will by abuser
A Texas man is accused of impregnating a minor and coercing her into taking abortion pills.
- WND comments on proposed reforms to Texas' futile care law
New bill in works would end life despite patient, family wishes
- Texas rallies for higher abortion clinic standards, vows to prevent Gosnell horrors
Commonsense legislation would hold abortion clinics to the same standards and regulations to which other medical facilities are held.
- SB303: Long on process; short on patient protections
State Senate sends flawed and dangerous Advance Directive Bill to House
- Texas Right to Life outlines concerns with SB303 and CSSB303
Here is a chart comparing the proposed reforms of the Texas Advanced Directive Law, to real, effective reform.
- State and national Pro-Life leaders oppose Senate Bill 303, House Bill 1444
In a letter to Texas State Legislators, Pro-Life leaders and medical professionals stated their concerns with proposed "reforms" to the Texas futile care law.
- Dr. Elizabeth Wickham, President of LifeTree, Comments on Texas SB 303
- Texas Preborn Pain: Pro-Life side prevails in hearing
Multiple Pro-Life medical and legal experts demonstrated the need for and defended the bill against one of the most pro-abortion members of the Texas House of Representatives.
- Texas is about to face another crisis in its healthcare
Everyone in the State, regardless of their present state of health could be affected by this Bill in the event of a serious illness or an accident.
- Experts set to testify on Texas Right to Life's PreBorn Pain Bill
Medical professionals will testify before the House State Affairs Committee offering support of the Texas Preborn Pain Bill.